Easton Metropolis Council reverses determination on South Sixth Road storage

EASTON, Pa. – Easton Metropolis Council reversed a earlier determination Wednesday night time and accredited the demolition of a one-story concrete block storage within the space traditionally often called Easton’s “Dutchtown neighborhood.” The vote was 4-3.

The legislative physique denied beforehand a certificates of appropriateness for the storage demolition and an accompanying undertaking final Oct. 27. The undertaking proposal featured a five-story, 34-unit house constructing with 29 parking areas at 34-42 S. Sixth St.

That vote contradicted the Easton Historic District Fee’s suggestion made at its Oct. 11 assembly that council situation a certificates of appropriateness for the storage’s demolition that runs alongside the property’s rear, however not for the following house undertaking.

In rendering its determination in October, the fee cited the storage’s “very poor situation and minimal historic significance.”

Nevertheless, the fee at the moment additionally rejected a proposal to demolish a home on the location and assemble the brand new house housing. The home was mentioned to be “a contributing useful resource within the historic district” and the proposed house constructing’s peak can be “considerably greater than different buildings on the block.”

The applicant, ANR Improvement, appealed to the Courtroom of Frequent Pleas of Northampton County, arguing {that a} “full and full report of the proceedings” on the Oct. 27 council assembly was not made.

Below Native Company Legislation, meaning the court docket could hear all the attraction or could remand the listening to again to the company — on this case, Easton Metropolis Council.

The court docket agreed with ANR and opted for the latter choice, stipulating a remand for a brand new council listening to for the aim of constructing a full and full report inside 45 days of the Feb. 22 court docket directive.

See also  Gov. Wolf visits Allentown to push for additional investments in training

The applicant’s lawyer, Stephanie Kobal, referred to as three witnesses throughout a listening to Wednesday night time. One was architect Jeff Martinson, who testified that the storage “had no historic worth by any means.”

Nevertheless, residents who spoke mentioned approving the storage would enable some growth to finally materialize. Those that spoke had been involved a possible undertaking wouldn’t resemble the encompassing neighborhood.

In arguing for her consumer, Kobal mentioned these ideas weren’t related to what council was tasked with contemplating.

“What’s earlier than you is that this singular storage, and I feel we met our burden tonight,” Kobal mentioned.

Mayor Sal Panto mentioned he understood residents’ considerations, with a caveat.

“I feel the elephant within the room is just not the storage,” Panto mentioned previous to the vote.

Nevertheless, he agreed with the applicant and the historic district fee that the storage itself had no historic worth. That mentioned, he advised the property’s proprietor and president of ANR — Monty Kalsi — who was in attendance, “give you one thing new” for a growth plan moderately than the earlier proposal, or he would not go for it.

Different enterprise

Council accredited amending the executive code to state that the mayor’s appointments to town’s housing authority ought to embody council’s recommendation and consent.

Lastly, council accredited varied contracts Wednesday night time. One deal designated the YMCA of Easton, Phillipsburg and Neighborhood to handle town’s two out of doors swimming pools — at Eddyside Park and Heil Park — for the 2022 swimming season.