How Pittsburgh feels about local weather change insurance policies

In accordance with the Pew Analysis Heart, about two-thirds of Individuals really feel the federal authorities just isn’t doing sufficient to counteract the results of local weather change. Whereas a majority of U.S. adults acknowledge local weather change to be an actual subject, there may be much less consensus with reference to what measures to take to deal with the worsening local weather disaster. Options equivalent to planting extra timber to soak up carbon emissions garnered widespread, bipartisan assist. Approval for taxing firms based mostly on their emissions output or introducing stricter emissions requirements for autos, then again, appeared to fall alongside occasion traces, with 86-89% of Democratic-leaning respondents supporting these measures, versus 52-55% of Republican-leaning respondents.

Attitudes towards local weather change insurance policies are break up by greater than mere political occasion affiliation, nevertheless. Different essential demographic elements embody generational variations, gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic scenario, and proximity to a shoreline the place pure disasters have elevated in frequency. Financial reliance on fossil fuels additionally performs a big function in whether or not folks assist or oppose local weather change measures on each a neighborhood and federal degree. To be able to parse how folks in Pittsburgh really feel about local weather change insurance policies, Stacker compiled statistics utilizing information from the Yale Program on Local weather Change Communication. The info is from a survey carried out in 2020.

– Assist in Pittsburgh for funding analysis into renewable power sources: 85.2%

— #172 highest amongst all metros

— 0.5% decrease than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist funding analysis into renewable power sources

#1. Ithaca, NY: 90.4% assist funding analysis into renewable power sources

#2. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA: 90.3%

#3. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH: 90.1%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist funding analysis into renewable power sources

See also  17-year-old gunshot sufferer not cooperating with investigators, Easton police say

#1. Amarillo, TX: 79.0% assist funding analysis into renewable power sources

#2. Houma-Thibodaux, LA: 79.7%

#3. Longview, TX: 79.7%

– Assist in Pittsburgh for regulating CO2 as a pollutant: 77.0%

— #42 highest amongst all metros

— 2.5% greater than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist regulating CO2 as a pollutant

#1. Ithaca, NY: 82.9% assist regulating CO2 as a pollutant

#2. Ann Arbor, MI: 80.4%

#3. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH: 80.3%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist regulating CO2 as a pollutant

#1. Provo-Orem, UT: 65.0% assist regulating CO2 as a pollutant

#2. Amarillo, TX: 65.2%

#3. Midland, TX: 65.3%

– Assist in Pittsburgh for setting strict limits on current coal-fire energy vegetation: 67.1%

— #104 highest amongst all metros

— 0.6% decrease than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist setting strict limits on current coal-fire energy vegetation

#1. City Honolulu, HI: 81.1% assist setting strict limits on current coal-fire energy vegetation

#2. Ann Arbor, MI: 78.5%

#3. Ithaca, NY: 78.2%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist setting strict limits on current coal-fire energy vegetation

#1. Farmington, NM: 46.3% assist setting strict limits on current coal-fire energy vegetation

#2. Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH: 49.2%

#3. Longview, TX: 51.4%

– Assist in Pittsburgh for requiring fossil gasoline corporations to pay a carbon tax and use the cash to cut back different taxes (equivalent to revenue tax) by an equal quantity: 70.0%

— #58 highest amongst all metros

— 2.2% greater than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist requiring fossil gasoline corporations to pay a carbon tax and use the cash to cut back different taxes (equivalent to revenue tax) by an equal quantity

#1. Ithaca, NY: 77.1% assist requiring fossil gasoline corporations to pay a carbon tax and use the cash to cut back different taxes (equivalent to revenue tax) by an equal quantity

See also  Lady will get 15 to 30 years after plea in 2019 toddler's demise

#2. New York-Newark-Jersey Metropolis, NY-NJ-PA: 76.9%

#3. City Honolulu, HI: 76.7%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist requiring fossil gasoline corporations to pay a carbon tax and use the cash to cut back different taxes (equivalent to revenue tax) by an equal quantity

#1. Provo-Orem, UT: 53.1% assist requiring fossil gasoline corporations to pay a carbon tax and use the cash to cut back different taxes (equivalent to revenue tax) by an equal quantity

#2. Casper, WY: 53.9%

#3. St. George, UT: 54.2%

– Assist in Pittsburgh for requiring utilities to supply 20% electrical energy from renewable sources: 64.8%

— #106 highest amongst all metros

— 0.1% decrease than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist requiring utilities to supply 20% electrical energy from renewable sources

#1. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA: 72.8% assist requiring utilities to supply 20% electrical energy from renewable sources

#2. Ann Arbor, MI: 72.2%

#3. City Honolulu, HI: 72.2%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist requiring utilities to supply 20% electrical energy from renewable sources

#1. Provo-Orem, UT: 52.2% assist requiring utilities to supply 20% electrical energy from renewable sources

#2. Decatur, AL: 54.7%

#3. Johnson Metropolis, TN: 55.5%

– Assist in Pittsburgh for offering tax rebates for individuals who buy energy-efficient autos or photo voltaic panels: 83.0%

— #81 highest amongst all metros

— 0.9% greater than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist offering tax rebates for individuals who buy energy-efficient autos or photo voltaic panels

#1. Ithaca, NY: 86.6% assist offering tax rebates for individuals who buy energy-efficient autos or photo voltaic panels

See also  Memorial Day occasions held throughout area

#2. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH: 86.1%

#3. Ann Arbor, MI: 86.0%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist offering tax rebates for individuals who buy energy-efficient autos or photo voltaic panels

#1. Amarillo, TX: 75.2% assist offering tax rebates for individuals who buy energy-efficient autos or photo voltaic panels

#2. Houma-Thibodaux, LA: 75.3%

#3. Texarkana, TX-AR: 76.0%

– Assist in Pittsburgh for drilling for oil within the Arctic Nationwide Wildlife Refuge: 30.6%

— #275 highest amongst all metros

— 1.1% decrease than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist drilling for oil within the Arctic Nationwide Wildlife Refuge

#1. Dalton, GA: 43.7% assist drilling for oil within the Arctic Nationwide Wildlife Refuge

#2. Lima, OH: 41.6%

#3. Enid, OK: 41.4%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist drilling for oil within the Arctic Nationwide Wildlife Refuge

#1. Ann Arbor, MI: 21.9% assist drilling for oil within the Arctic Nationwide Wildlife Refuge

#2. Ithaca, NY: 22.5%

#3. Corvallis, OR: 23.1%

– Assist in Pittsburgh assist for increasing offshore drilling for oil and pure fuel off the U.S. coast: 52.6%

— #235 highest amongst all metros

— 0.4% greater than nationwide common

Metros the place the most individuals assist increasing offshore drilling for oil and pure fuel off the U.S. coast

#1. Lake Charles, LA: 69.4% assist increasing offshore drilling for oil and pure fuel off the U.S. coast

#2. Alexandria, LA: 68.9%

#3. Decatur, AL: 67.7%

Metros the place the fewest folks assist increasing offshore drilling for oil and pure fuel off the U.S. coast

#1. Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA: 34.6% assist increasing offshore drilling for oil and pure fuel off the U.S. coast

#2. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA: 36.6%

#3. Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA: 37.0%